Starlink Mini vs Standard: Size and Performance Comparison
As SpaceX expands its Starlink internet offering, the arrival of the Starlink Mini marks a turning point for users seeking portability and power efficiency. But how does it compare to the standard Starlink terminal (also known as Starlink Gen 2 or Residential Kit)?
In this guide, we break down the key differences between the two models — including size, weight, speed, power requirements, and intended use — to help you decide which one fits your needs.
What is Starlink Mini?
The Starlink Mini is a compact satellite terminal introduced in 2024. It offers similar internet speeds to the standard Starlink dish but in a much smaller and lighter form factor. It is designed for on-the-go users, such as RV travelers, remote workers, field operators, and off-grid households.
Size and weight comparison
One of the most obvious differences between the two models is physical size and portability.
Feature | Starlink Mini | Starlink Standard (Gen 2) |
---|---|---|
Dish dimensions | ~28 x 25 cm (11 x 9.5 in) | ~51 x 30 cm (20 x 12 in) |
Thickness | ~4 cm (1.6 in) | ~5 cm (2 in) |
Weight (dish only) | ~1.1 kg (2.4 lbs) | ~2.9 kg (6.4 lbs) |
Mounting | Integrated kickstand | Pipe mount or tripod |
The Mini is about 60% smaller and lighter, making it easy to carry in a backpack or laptop bag. The built-in stand also means fewer accessories are needed to deploy it quickly.
Power consumption
Starlink Mini is also far more efficient in power usage, which makes it ideal for solar or battery-powered setups.
Feature | Starlink Mini | Standard Starlink |
---|---|---|
Average power draw | ~20–40 watts | ~50–75 watts |
Power supply | USB-C PD (special 48V input) | Standard Starlink power brick |
Battery compatibility | Easy with portable DC batteries | Requires higher-capacity inverter or power station |
Because of its low energy draw, the Mini can be powered for hours using portable lithium batteries — a big plus for mobile users.
Internet speed and performance
Despite its compact size, the Starlink Mini offers performance that's surprisingly close to the full-size dish.
Feature | Starlink Mini | Standard Starlink |
---|---|---|
Download speed | 40–100 Mbps (typical) | 50–200 Mbps (typical) |
Upload speed | 8–15 Mbps | 10–25 Mbps |
Latency | 25–50 ms | 25–50 ms |
Network priority | Slightly lower* | Higher priority (standard users) |
💡 *Mini users may experience slightly lower priority during network congestion, especially in high-demand areas.
For general web browsing, streaming, remote work, and video calls, both models perform well. However, users needing maximum upload speeds (e.g., for live broadcasting or cloud syncing) may still prefer the standard dish.
Portability and setup
Starlink Mini is designed for mobility. It sets up faster and can be used in places where carrying or mounting the full-size dish would be difficult.
-
Starlink Mini: Plug-and-play with integrated stand, easier to transport, ideal for travel or temporary locations.
-
Standard Starlink: Requires fixed mounting or tripod, better for permanent or semi-permanent installations.
Both models can be moved between service locations, but Mini is clearly the better option for frequent moves.
Price and subscription
As of mid-2025, the pricing varies by region and user type. Starlink Mini hardware is generally more affordable, and the service plan may be separate from standard residential subscriptions.
Feature | Starlink Mini | Standard Starlink |
---|---|---|
Hardware cost | ~$599 USD | ~$599–699 USD |
Service plan | Mobile data add-on or standalone | Residential or Roam plans |
Activation | App-based | App-based |
In some regions, Mini service is sold as an add-on to existing plans, while in others, it may be available standalone.
Who should choose Starlink Mini?
Starlink Mini is ideal for:
-
RV travelers and overlanders
-
Remote workers who move often
-
Field technicians and emergency responders
-
Cabin or tiny home users with limited power
-
Off-grid explorers with solar setups
Standard Starlink is better for:
-
Households with higher bandwidth needs
-
Permanent or semi-permanent installations
-
Users in areas with high network congestion
-
Businesses requiring consistent performance
Final verdict: Mini vs Standard
Use Case | Best Option |
---|---|
Portability, backpack travel | Starlink Mini |
Powering with battery or solar | Starlink Mini |
Streaming 4K at home | Standard Starlink |
Large household use | Standard Starlink |
Internet on the road | Starlink Mini |
Maximum network priority | Standard Starlink |
Ultimately, both Starlink terminals offer excellent performance. But if portability, weight, and energy efficiency are key factors for your lifestyle, the Mini is the clear winner.